• Türkçe
    • English
  • English 
    • Türkçe
    • English
  • Login
View Item 
  •   DSpace Home
  • Fakülteler
  • Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi
  • Ebelik Bölümü
  • Makale Koleksiyonu
  • View Item
  •   DSpace Home
  • Fakülteler
  • Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi
  • Ebelik Bölümü
  • Makale Koleksiyonu
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Editorial: Uterine fibroid surgery in gynecology and obstetrics and reproduction: Lights and shadows

Thumbnail

View/Open

Tam Metin / Full Text (361.7Kb)

Date

2025

Author

Sparić, Radmilla
Hatırnaz, Şafak
Tinelli, Andrea

Metadata

Show full item record

Citation

Sparić R, Hatirnaz S and Tinelli A (2025) Editorial: Uterine fibroid surgery in gynecology and obstetrics and reproduction: lights and shadows. Front. Surg. 12:1698612.

Abstract

The most prevalent benign tumors in women of reproductive age are uterine fibroids. The mainstay for treating symptomatic fibroids that don't respond to less invasive or medicinal treatments is still surgery. Myomectomy, which entails surgically removing fibroids while leaving the uterus intact, is the recommended course of action for women who want to preserve their fertility. Nevertheless, it doesn't stop new fibroids from growing (1–5). Women who have severe disease or no desire for conception may benefit from a hysterectomy, the final therapy that involves removing the uterus and resolves symptoms permanently. The benefit of a hysterectomy is that there is no subsequent recurrence of fibroids, despite the risks involved with major surgery (3, 6). Minimally invasive alternatives include uterine artery embolization (UAE), which deprives fibroids of their blood supply causing shrinkage but may carry pregnancy-related risks. Other noninvasive options such as magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) or high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) offer thermal ablation of fibroids with symptom relief and uterine preservation. These modalities exhibit low complication rates and suit patients seeking uterus-sparing treatments (1, 3, 7).

Source

Frontiers in Surgery

Volume

12

URI

https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/surgery/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2025.1698612/full
https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2025.1698612
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12780/1292

Collections

  • Makale Koleksiyonu [10]
  • Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu [330]



DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
@mire NV
 

 




| Instruction | Guide | Contact |

DSpace@Kent

by OpenAIRE
Advanced Search

sherpa/romeo

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypeLanguageDepartmentCategoryPublisherAccess TypeInstitution AuthorThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypeLanguageDepartmentCategoryPublisherAccess TypeInstitution Author

My Account

LoginRegister

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
@mire NV
 

 


|| Guide || Instruction || Library || İstanbul Kent University || OAI-PMH ||

İstanbul Kent University, İstanbul, Turkey
If you find any errors in content, please contact:

Creative Commons License
İstanbul Kent University Institutional Repository is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 Unported License..

DSpace@Kent:


DSpace 6.2

tarafından İdeal DSpace hizmetleri çerçevesinde özelleştirilerek kurulmuştur.