Immediate effects of mobilization with movement technique on cervical muscle stiffness, pain, and range of motion in individuals with mechanical neck pain: A double-blind randomized controlled trial
Citation
Analay Akbaba, Y., Özdemir, A. E., Bali, K., & Yalçın, E. (2025). Immediate Effects of Mobilization With Movement Technique on Cervical Muscle Stiffness, Pain, and Range of Motion in Individuals With Mechanical Neck Pain: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice, 1–12.Abstract
Background: Mulligan sustained natural apophyseal glide (SNAG) is a mobilization technique that
aims to reduce pain and improve function by correcting positional errors in the facet joint.
Purpose: To investigate the immediate effects of the Mulligan SNAG application on muscle
stiffness, pain, pressure pain threshold (PPT) and range of motion (RoM) in patients with chronic
mechanical neck pain.
Methods: A randomized, double-blind trial was conducted. Forty individuals with chronic mechan ical neck pain (mean age = 39.35 ± 6.68 years) were randomized into two groups: Mobilization with
movement group (MWMG), and sham group (SG). Muscle stiffness was measured with MyotonPro,
pain intensity with Numerical Pain Rating Scale, cervical RoM with a digital inclinometer, and PPT
with an algometer. Measurements were performed pre-and 5 minutes post-intervention in a single
session.
Results: Muscle stiffness significantly changed in the MWMG for the left trapezius and right cervical
extensors (p = .003, effect size (ES) = 0.42; p = .031, ES = 0.49, respectively), whereas no significant
changes were observed in the SG (p = .097, ES = 0.12; p = .270, ES = 0.22, respectively). The MWMG
showed improvements in pain (p = .001, ES = 0.70) and RoM (right: p = .0001, ES = 0.89; left:
p = .0001, ES = 0.99). The SG also showed improvements in pain (p = .0001, ES = 0.76) and RoM
(right: p = .0001, ES = 0.49; left: p = .0001, ES = 0.35). PPT improvements were observed in the
MWMG for right and left trapezius (p = .0001, ES = 1.21; p = .040, ES = 0.43, respectively), whereas
no significant changes occurred in the SG (p = .713, ES = 0.03; p = .839, ES = 0.01, respectively).
Conclusion: The mobilization with movement technique leads to significant immediate improve ments in muscle stiffness and pain-related parameters in individuals with chronic neck pain.
Source
Physiotherapy Theory and PracticeURI
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09593985.2025.2473471https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2025.2473471
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12780/1056