Assessing regionness in Central Asia: A conceptual framework for Post-Soviet regionalism and future projections
Citation
Özel, M.; Koray, M. Assessing regionness in Central Asia: A conceptual framework for Post-Soviet regionalism and future projections. Asya Jeopolitiği, 2025, 339-373.Abstract
This study develops a conceptual testbed to analyze regional integration
by applying the theory of “regionness” to Central Asia’s post-2000 trajectory. Combining
theoretical frameworks with empirical data from international organizations, we evaluate
the region’s political, economic, and security dynamics through five dimensions of regional
cohesion: geographic interdependence, institutionalization, identity formation, conflict
management, and actor networks. Regional integration by applying the theory of “regionness”
to Central Asia’s post-2000 trajectory. Combining theoretical frameworks with empirical data
from international organizations, we evaluate the region’s political, economic, and security
dynamics through five dimensions of regional cohesion: geographic interdependence,
institutionalization, identity formation, conflict management, and actor networks.
Findings reveal Central Asia remains a “regional complex” dominated by external influences
and fragmented cooperation, where authoritarian governance, water disputes, and elite
resistance constrain deeper integration. Despite shared historical and cultural ties, the region’s
potential is undermined by Soviet legacies—including arbitrary borders and infrastructure
dependencies—and by great-power competition (Russia, China, EU). Recent developments
(e.g., rising intraregional trade and climate cooperation initiatives) suggest nascent progress,
but institutional weaknesses persist.
Projections to 2030 highlight two potential pathways: continued stagnation under
entrenched elites or transformative growth through political reforms and infrastructure
connectivity. The study concludes with policy recommendations for strengthening regionalism,
emphasizing digitalization, youth engagement, and balanced external partnerships. By bridging
theoretical rigor with actionable insights, this framework offers a replicable model for assessing
regionalization in other contested geographies.
Source
Asya JeopolitiğiURI
https://www.nobelyayin.com/asya-jeopolitigi-asian-geopolitics-22503.htmlhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12780/1282
Collections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
The fate of regionalization in South America: ephemeral regional initiatives
Özel, Mesut (Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık, 2024)South America bears the potential or resources, such as population and fertile land, to have more influence in global affairs. However, historically, it has yet to implement regionalization to pave the way for successful ... -
From rivalry to regionalism: Overcoming the India–Pakistan divide for the revival of the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation
Raza, Muhammad Aqeel; Özel, Mesut (Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık, 2025)The South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC), established in 1985 to promote regional economic integration, peace, and development, has consistently underperformed compared to other regional blocs like ... -
Comparison of the effectiveness of TENS and low-level laser therapy applied to the sciatic nerve region in chronic lumbar radiculopathy
Karagül, Sevil; Kibar, Sibel; Ay, Saime; Evcik, Deniz; Ergin, Süreyya (Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, 2024)Introduction: This study was carried out to assess and compare the efficacies of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) and low-level laser therapy (LLLT) applied to sciatic Valleix points to reduce sciatica ...


















