• Türkçe
    • English
  • English 
    • Türkçe
    • English
  • Login
View Item 
  •   DSpace Home
  • Fakülteler
  • Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi
  • Klinik Bilimler Bölümü
  • Makale Koleksiyonu
  • View Item
  •   DSpace Home
  • Fakülteler
  • Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi
  • Klinik Bilimler Bölümü
  • Makale Koleksiyonu
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

A randomized clinical trial of hyaluronic acid gel pulpotomy in primary molars with 1 year follow-up

Thumbnail

View/Open

Tam Metin / Full Text (1.551Mb)

Date

2021

Author

İldeş, Gökçe Çiçek
Sezgin, Batın Ilgıt
Vieira, Alexandre Rezende
Menteş, Ali

Metadata

Show full item record

Citation

Ildeş, G. Ç., Sezgin, B. I., Vieira, A. R., & Mentes, A. (2021). A randomized clinical trial of hyaluronic acid gel pulpotomy in primary molars with 1 year follow-up. Acta odontologica Scandinavica, 1–8. Advance online publication. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00016357.2021.1998612

Abstract

Abstract Objective: This randomized clinical study aimed to evaluate the success of hyaluronic acid (HA) as a pulpotomy medicament of human primary molars and to compare it with formocresol (FC) and ferric sulphate (FS) pulpotomy treatments up to 12 months. Materials and methods: The study was conducted with 130 primary molars of 44 children. The ethical approval and registration to clinical trials (No: NCT04115358) were completed. After the removal of all the coronal pulp tissue, a 0.5% HA gel, or a FC, or a 20% FS solution were applied randomly to the radicular pulp tissues of the primary molars. Then, the pulp chambers were filled with a zinc oxide eugenol cement and restored either with a composite filling material or with a stainless-steel crown. The treatment success rates of the 3 groups were followed and compared clinically and radiographically at 1st-, 3rd-, 6th- and 12th-months. Results: Primary molars treated with FC, FS and HA dressings were clinically successful 77.5%, 86.8% and 87.5% respectively after 12th-month follow-up (p > .05). Radiographic successes of FC, FS and HA groups were lower than clinical successes (57.6%, 68.8%, 57.9% respectively at the 12th-month) but the difference between the groups was not statistically significant (p > .05). Equivalence analysis assuming not more than 10% difference between the materials suggested that HA was not inferior to FC or FS. Conclusions: Within the limitations of this study, our randomized clinical trial shows that HA is a promising pulpotomy medicament in primary molars. However, further studies are justified to further improve the HA material success.

Source

Acta Odontologica Scandinavica

URI

https://doi.org/10.1080/00016357.2021.1998612
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12780/483

Collections

  • Makale Koleksiyonu [120]
  • PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu [158]
  • Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu [301]
  • WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu [268]



DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
@mire NV
 

 




| Instruction | Guide | Contact |

DSpace@Kent

by OpenAIRE
Advanced Search

sherpa/romeo

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypeLanguageDepartmentCategoryPublisherAccess TypeInstitution AuthorThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypeLanguageDepartmentCategoryPublisherAccess TypeInstitution Author

My Account

LoginRegister

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
@mire NV
 

 


|| Guide || Instruction || Library || İstanbul Kent University || OAI-PMH ||

İstanbul Kent University, İstanbul, Turkey
If you find any errors in content, please contact:

Creative Commons License
İstanbul Kent University Institutional Repository is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 Unported License..

DSpace@Kent:


DSpace 6.2

tarafından İdeal DSpace hizmetleri çerçevesinde özelleştirilerek kurulmuştur.