• Türkçe
    • English
  • English 
    • Türkçe
    • English
  • Login
View Item 
  •   DSpace Home
  • Fakülteler
  • İktisadi, İdari ve Sosyal Bilimler Fakültesi
  • Psikoloji Bölümü
  • Makale Koleksiyonu
  • View Item
  •   DSpace Home
  • Fakülteler
  • İktisadi, İdari ve Sosyal Bilimler Fakültesi
  • Psikoloji Bölümü
  • Makale Koleksiyonu
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Meta-Worry Questionnaire

Thumbnail

View/Open

Tam Metin / Full Text (185.8Kb)

Date

2022

Author

Gündüz, Anıl
Gündoğmuş, İbrahim
Engin, Betül
Bağlar, Gonca
Usta Gündüz, Elvan Başak

Metadata

Show full item record

Citation

Gündüz A, Gündoğmuş İ, Engin B, Bağlar G, Usta Gündüz EB. The Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Meta-Worry Questionnaire. Arch Neuropsychiatry 2022; 59(3):218−225.

Abstract

Introduction: This study aims to investigate the validity and reliability of the Meta-Worry Questionnaire in the Turkish version as a contribution to clinical practice. Method: The research sample consisted of two groups. Cases were people who have General Anxiety Disorder (n=165) and controls were age and sex-matched healthy volunteers (n=158). To evaluate the psychometric properties of the scale, Meta-Worry Questionnaire, Metacognition Questionnaire-30, Beck Depression Inventory, Beck Anxiety Inventory, Penn State Worry Questionnaire and Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 Questionnaire were used. Results: In this study, Cronbach's alpha coefficient values of frequency and belief components were found 0.92 and 0.94, respectively. At the same time, excluding each item, Cronbach's alpha coefficient values of these two components also remained above 0.90, regardless of which item was chosen. While the frequency component accounted for 69.07% of the total variance, the belief component accounted for 72.95%. The area under the ROC curve is 0.948 for the frequency component and 0.944 for the belief component. The construct validity of the scale was tested with Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis and the one-dimensional structure of the scale was shown. To evaluate the psychometric properties of the scale, other scales which are related to metacognition were used. Conclusion: All items in the tool displayed a high correlation with the overall questionnaire. High total variance of the scale indicates its high validity. These results suggest high reliability of the tool as well as consistency of every item it includes.

Source

Nöro Psikiyatri Arşivi

Volume

59

Issue

3

URI

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36160071/
https://www.noropsikiyatriarsivi.com/sayilar/2022/59_3/en/npa_59-3_218-225.pdf
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12780/670

Collections

  • Makale Koleksiyonu [49]
  • PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu [158]
  • Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu [301]
  • WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu [268]



DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
@mire NV
 

 




| Instruction | Guide | Contact |

DSpace@Kent

by OpenAIRE
Advanced Search

sherpa/romeo

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypeLanguageDepartmentCategoryPublisherAccess TypeInstitution AuthorThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypeLanguageDepartmentCategoryPublisherAccess TypeInstitution Author

My Account

LoginRegister

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
@mire NV
 

 


|| Guide || Instruction || Library || İstanbul Kent University || OAI-PMH ||

İstanbul Kent University, İstanbul, Turkey
If you find any errors in content, please contact:

Creative Commons License
İstanbul Kent University Institutional Repository is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 Unported License..

DSpace@Kent:


DSpace 6.2

tarafından İdeal DSpace hizmetleri çerçevesinde özelleştirilerek kurulmuştur.