The radiographic evaluation of 11 different resin composites

dc.contributor.authorKopuz, Dilan
dc.contributor.authorSultanzade, Özlem Erçin
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-12T07:15:33Z
dc.date.available2023-10-12T07:15:33Z
dc.date.issued2023en_US
dc.departmentİstanbul Kent Üniversitesi, Fakülteler, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Klinik Bilimler Bölümüen_US
dc.description.abstractRadiopacities of dental materials used in restorations are very important in making the radiographic diagnosis. Therefore, the aim of our study was to evaluate the radiopacity of fve single-shade and six simplishade resin composites with digital technique. Five diferent single-shade (Charisma Topaz One, Omnichroma, Clearfl Majesty ES-2 Universal, Vittra APS Unique, ZenChroma) and six diferent simplishade resin composites (G-aenial A’CHORD, Essentia Universal, OptiShade, Estelite Asteria, Filtek Universal, Filtek Z250) were used. For each group, fve disk-shaped resin composites of 1 mm and 2 mm thicknesses were prepared. As a control, tooth slices with 1 mm and 2 mm thicknesses and a 99.5% pure aluminum step-wedge were used. The samples, tooth slices, and a step-wedge were placed on a photostimulable phosphor plate. Digi tal radiographs were taken from 30 and 40 cm distances (70 kVp, 7 mA 0.28 ms). The images were analyzed using ImageJ software to measure the mean gray values. Data were analyzed using SPSS 22 package program and Kruskal–Wallis H Test (p<0.05). The highest radiopacity was seen in Filtek Universal at both distances and thicknesses. Omnichroma had the lowest radiopacity in all parameters. All specimens showed higher radiopacity than dentin. Except for Omnichroma 1 and 2 mm thick, Clearfl Majesty ES-2 Universal 2 mm thick, samples showed higher radiopacities than enamel (p<0.05). The restorative materials tested were found to be more radiopaque than dentin. The samples passed the International Organiza tion for Standardization for radiopacity values. The radiopacity values were afected by thickness and type of materials.en_US
dc.identifier.citationKopuz, D., Erçin, Ö. The radiographic evaluation of 11 different resin composites. Odontology (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-023-00854-5en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10266-023-00854-5
dc.identifier.issn1618-1247
dc.identifier.issn1618-1255
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-2979-6068en_US
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-3379-4567en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85173007487
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.urihttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10266-023-00854-5
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12780/612
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001074508900001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Sceince
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.institutionauthorKopuz, Dilan
dc.institutionauthorSultanzade, Özlem Erçin
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSPRINGERen_US
dc.relation.journalOdontologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectRadiopacityen_US
dc.subjectSingle-shade resin compositeen_US
dc.subjectSimplishade resin compositeen_US
dc.subjectDental digital radiographyen_US
dc.subjectAluminum step-wedgeen_US
dc.titleThe radiographic evaluation of 11 different resin compositesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket

Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
The radiographic evaluation of 11 different resin composites.pdf
Boyut:
807.88 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin / Full Text

Lisans paketi

Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
license.txt
Boyut:
1.44 KB
Biçim:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Açıklama: