Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorŞen, Nazmiye
dc.contributor.authorSermet, Bülent
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-27T11:39:12Z
dc.date.available2025-03-27T11:39:12Z
dc.date.issued2024en_US
dc.identifier.citationSen N, Sermet B. Masking Ability of Monolithic CAD/CAM Laminate Veneers Over Different Resin Cement Shades and Substrate Colors. Int J Prosthodont. 2024 Sep 27;37(5):540-546.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0893-2174
dc.identifier.issn1942-4426
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.quintessence-publishing.com/usa/en/article/4500435/the-international-journal-of-prosthodontics/2024/05/masking-ability-of-monolithic-cadcam-laminate-veneers-over-different-resin-cement-shades-and-substrate-colors
dc.identifier.urihttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37824338/
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12780/1062
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To compare the masking ability of monolithic CAD/CAM veneers placed over different resin cement shades and substrate colors. Materials and Methods: Veneers were milled from four different monolithic CAD/CAM restorative materials: feldspathic ceramic (VMII), lithium disilicate ceramic (Emax CAD), zirconiareinforced lithium silicate ceramic (VS), and high-translucency zirconia ceramic (YZ-XT). Veneers were luted on natural tooth-colored (ND1) or discolored substrates (ND3 or ND5) using two different resin cement shades (opaque white or translucent). Each CAD/CAM material, resin cement shade, and substrate combination comprised 9 sample veneers (N = 216). Color parameters were obtained using a dental spectrophotometer before and after luting. Color differences (ΔE00) were calculated using CIEDE2000 formula and compared to perceptibility (P = .81 ΔE00 units) and acceptability (AT = 1.77 ΔE00 units) visual thresholds. Color variation data were statistically analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests with Bonferroni-Holm correction (α = .05). Results: The highest ΔE00 value was obtained in the VMII group placed over a discolored substrate, followed by the Emax CAD, YZ-XT, and VS groups. The effect of material types on ΔE00 values was significantly observed when the veneers were luted on discolored substrates using translucent resin cement (P < .05). Conclusions: Restorative material type, substrate color, and resin cement shade affect the masking ability of monolithic CAD/CAM laminate veneers.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherQuintessence Publishingen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.11607/ijp.8533en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectOptical-propertiesen_US
dc.subjectCeramicsen_US
dc.subjectCAD/CAMen_US
dc.subjectMonolithicen_US
dc.subjectToothen_US
dc.titleMasking ability of monolithic CAD/CAM laminate veneers over different resin cement shades and substrate colorsen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentİstanbul Kent Üniversitesi, Fakülteler, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Klinik Bilimler Bölümüen_US
dc.contributor.authorID0000-0003-2768-2112en_US
dc.contributor.institutionauthorŞen, Nazmiye
dc.identifier.volume37en_US
dc.identifier.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.startpage540en_US
dc.identifier.endpage546en_US
dc.relation.journalInternational Journal of Prosthodonticsen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster