Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorŞeşen, Pınar
dc.contributor.authorOk Tokaç, Sinem
dc.contributor.authorKaffaf, Mehmet Berk
dc.contributor.authorŞeşen Uslu, Yeşim
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-15T13:59:25Z
dc.date.available2025-10-15T13:59:25Z
dc.date.issued2025en_US
dc.identifier.citationSesen, P., Tokaç, S.O., Kaffaf, M.B. et al. Assessment of dental students’ perceptions of facial and smile aesthetics: impact of gender, education level, and family background. BMC Med Educ 25, 1350 (2025).en_US
dc.identifier.issn1472-6920
dc.identifier.urihttps://bmcmededuc.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12909-025-07931-z
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-07931-z
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12780/1245
dc.description.abstractBackground The aim of the study was to identify whether differences existed in the aesthetic perception of anatomical variations of the face and teeth among dental students, based on factors such as education level, gender, and the presence of a dentist in the family. Methods The study was carried out with dental students using the Google Forms platform. A young female model was selected for the survey, with no aesthetic-compromising restorations or pathologies in her maxillary anterior teeth. Standard facial and smile reference photographs were digitally manipulated to alter specific aesthetic features using professional image-editing software (Adobe Photoshop v.20.0.0, Adobe Inc., San Jose, California, USA). Participants evaluated these photographs, focusing on components such as facial symmetry, gingival position, buccal corridor, and occlusal plane angulation. Preclinical and clinical students rated the original and manipulated images on a scale from 1 to 5, with 5 representing the most aesthetically acceptable image and 1 representing the least pleasing one. Statistical analysis comprised Shapiro-Wilk test, Levene test, Mann-Whitney U test. Results In the research, 493 students participated, including 240 clinical students; 312 were female, and 89 had a dentist in their family. The overall aesthetic perception score was high (82.63±8.5). Clinical students demonstrated significantly better perceptions of midline diastema, occlusal plane inclination, clinical crown height, and dental modifications compared to preclinical students (p<0.05). Female students scored higher in lower facial height perception than males (p=0.014). The presence of a dentist in the family did not significantly influence aesthetic perception (p>0.05). Conclusion Clinical training positively impacted students’ ability to critically analyze aesthetics while maintaining function and naturalness. It can be suggested that, as the academic level increases in dental education, students’ aesthetic judgment skills also improve.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSpringer Natureen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1186/s12909-025-07931-zen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectGenderen_US
dc.subjectSmile aestheticsen_US
dc.subjectPhotograph modificationsen_US
dc.subjectPerceptionen_US
dc.subjectDental studentsen_US
dc.titleAssessment of dental students’ perceptions of facial and smile aesthetics: Impact of gender, education level, and family backgrounden_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentİstanbul Kent Üniversitesi, Fakülteler, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Klinik Bilimler Bölümüen_US
dc.contributor.authorID0000-0002-7590-5280en_US
dc.contributor.authorID0000-0002-8635-7611en_US
dc.contributor.authorID0000-0002-7156-3770en_US
dc.contributor.institutionauthorŞeşen, Pınar
dc.contributor.institutionauthorOk Tokaç, Sinem
dc.contributor.institutionauthorKaffaf, Mehmet Berk
dc.relation.journalBMC Medical Educationen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster