Internal complaint- handling systems of online platforms, commercial law and the board of directors’ duty of care
Citation
Pehlivanoğlu, M. C. (2021). Internal complaint- handling systems of online platforms, commercial law and the board of directors’ duty of care. John Marshall Law Journal. 14(2). ss. 168-187.Abstract
Abstract:
Technology causes the emergence of new kinds of disputes and dispute
resolution methods. Accordingly, the era of online platform economy has
created its own types of disputes and needs its own unique methods to
deal with those disputes. Today, the dependence of business users on
online platforms implies that the platforms have a large scope to engage
in harmful trading practices which may unfairly limit business users’
online activities. The Regulation (EU) 2019/1150 of the European
Parliament and of the Council of 20 June 2019 requires online platforms
to establish internal complaint-handling systems. Internal complaint handling systems have utmost importance regarding online platforms’
decisions to restrict, suspend or terminate the business user’s accounts.
The Regulation provides the business users important procedural
safeguards. Internal complaint- handling systems appear as an
alternative dispute resolution method and supports the creation of
accessible justice regimes. When evaluated in conjunction with the
conventional alternative dispute resolution methods, it resembles the
negotiation method. This article opines that even in jurisdictions where
the Regulation is not applicable, the conventional commercial law
principles may still require an internal complaint- handling system’s
implementation by the online platforms. The article sets forth how this
may emerge by exemplifying the issue through the lens of trader’s duty to
act as a prudent businessman under Turkish law and the board of
director’s duty of care under US law. It is envisioned that internal
complaint-handling systems will play a crucial role in the online platform
economy, since the conventional principles of commercial law support
and would inherently require its implementation.
Source
John Marshall Law JournalVolume
14Issue
2Collections
- Makale Koleksiyonu [23]