Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorBedeloğlu, Elçin
dc.contributor.authorYalçın, Mustafa
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-25T09:19:58Z
dc.date.available2023-10-25T09:19:58Z
dc.date.issued2022en_US
dc.identifier.citationBedeloğlu E, Yalçın M. Evaluation of different fixation methods with finite element analysis in total mandibular subapical osteotomy. Elsevier 2022;123(2) 203-208.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2468-8509
dc.identifier.issn2468-7855
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468785521001166?via%3Dihub
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jormas.2021.05.006
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12780/653
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the stress distribution in various miniplates that were used in cases that underwent advancement with total mandibular subapical osteotomy (TMSO) using finite element analysis (FEA). Material and method: Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images of a patient with appropriate bone tissues were used as a reference for the modeling of the mandible. In all mandibular models, horizontal TMSO was performed in a region 5 mm away from the apex of the teeth and vertical TMSO was performed in the retromolar region, 10 mm posterior to the second molar tooth. After TMSO, the dentoalveolar segment was advanced 3 mm and miniplates were placed symmetrically at four points for fixation. Four different miniplates with 2.0 mm thickness were used. Three different forces were applied to the models. Stress distribution on the models was evaluated using maximum von Mises stress values. Results: The maximum von Mises stress occurred in Y + I and Y + L models following the application of 300 N force from the incisal. An evaluation of posterior unilateral force indicated that the stress was remarkably high in the models with a posterior I-plate. The stress in the Y + I model was higher under unilateral force compared to the stress in other models. Under posterior bilateral force, the maximum von Mises stress values occurred in the I-plates of T + I, Y + I, and L + I models (1006, 1012, and 1004 MPa, respectively). Conclusion: Within the limitations of our study, we found that the ideal stress distribution was in the T + L and L + L plate combinations in the plates used for fixation after advancement with TMSO. (C) 2021 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/j.jormas.2021.05.006en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectMandibleen_US
dc.subjectSubapical osteotomyen_US
dc.subjectMiniplateen_US
dc.subjectStress distributionen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of different fixation methods with finite element analysis in total mandibular subapical osteotomyen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentİstanbul Kent Üniversitesi, Fakülteler, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Klinik Bilimler Bölümüen_US
dc.contributor.authorIDhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-0154-6545en_US
dc.contributor.institutionauthorYalçın, Mustafa
dc.identifier.volume123en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage203en_US
dc.identifier.endpage208en_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Stomatology, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster