Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorKaygısız, Emine
dc.contributor.authorOcakoğlu, Gökhan
dc.contributor.authorKurnaz, Merve
dc.contributor.authorYüksel, Sema
dc.contributor.authorTortop, Tuba
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-27T12:00:17Z
dc.date.available2023-10-27T12:00:17Z
dc.date.issued2022en_US
dc.identifier.citationKaygısız E, Ocakoğlu G, Kurnaz M, Yüksel S, Tortop T. Geometric morphometric analysis of the pharyngeal airway during treatment of Class III malocclusion. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics (2022): 162(3); 374-385.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0889-5406
dc.identifier.issn1097-6752
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0889540622002645?via%3Dihub
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2021.04.028
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12780/677
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: The pharyngeal airway is important during diagnosis and treatment planning in orthodontics. This study aimed to compare the changes in the shape of the pharyngeal airway in patients with Class III malocclusion treated with a facemask (FM) with a removable maxillary appliance and modified tandem traction bow appliance (MTTBA). Methods: This study consisted of pretreatment and posttreatment lateral cephalograms of 35 subjects with skeletal and dental Class III malocclusion. In the first group, 20 patients (12 males, 8 females; mean age, 10.2 years) were treated with MTTBA. The mean treatment time was 12 months. In the second group, 15 patients (10 males, 5 females; mean age, 10.3 years) were treated with FM. The mean treatment time was 11.7 months. Nineteen pharyngeal landmarks were considered from the image corresponding to the midsagittal plane and marked using tpsDig software (version 2.04; Stony Brook, NY). Pharyngeal airway shape difference between the groups was assessed by performing a Generalized Procrustes analysis. The shape deformation of the pharyngeal airway from the pre- to posttreatment periods was evaluated using the thin-plate spline method. Results: There were no differences between MTTBA and FM groups according to airway shape for pretreatment and posttreatment periods. However, there were some deformities using the enlargement of the nasopharyngeal area in the FM group and oropharyngeal area in the MTTBA group according to pretreatment periods. Conclusions: There were no differences between the groups according to the mean pharyngeal airway shapes when the posttreatment periods of the FM and MTTBA groups were examined.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/j.ajodo.2021.04.028en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectMaxillary protractionen_US
dc.subjectFacemask therapyen_US
dc.subjectOrthognathic surgeryen_US
dc.subjectDimensionsen_US
dc.subjectExpansionen_US
dc.subjectAgenesisen_US
dc.subjectPositionen_US
dc.subjectSpaceen_US
dc.subjectSizeen_US
dc.titleGeometric morphometric analysis of the pharyngeal airway during treatment of Class III malocclusionen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentİstanbul Kent Üniversitesi, Fakülteler, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Klinik Bilimler Bölümüen_US
dc.contributor.authorIDhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-2945-755Xen_US
dc.contributor.institutionauthorKurnaz, Merve
dc.identifier.volume162en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage374en_US
dc.identifier.endpage385en_US
dc.relation.journalAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedicsen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster