Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorKaya, Doğan Ilgaz
dc.contributor.authorŞatır, Samed
dc.contributor.authorÖztaş, Beyza
dc.contributor.authorYıldırım, Hasan
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-16T06:38:42Z
dc.date.available2024-07-16T06:38:42Z
dc.date.issued2024en_US
dc.identifier.citationKaya, D.I.; ¸Satır, S.; Öztas, B.; Yıldırım, H. Avoiding Sinus Floor Elevation by Placing a Palatally Angled Implant: A Morphological Study Using Cross-Sectional Analysis Determined by CBCT. Diagnostics 2024, 14, 12.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2075-4418
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.mdpi.com/2075-4418/14/12/1242
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14121242
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12780/847
dc.description.abstractBackgrounds: Tooth loss in the posterior maxilla often necessitates dental implant placement, but the maxillary sinus anatomy poses challenges, especially during sinus floor elevation. Mesially angled implants are an alternative for total edentulism, but for single tooth deficiencies, palatally angled implants may offer a solution. This study evaluates the prevalence of avoiding sinus floor elevation by placing palatally angled implants in cases with a single missing tooth. Methods: A retrospective study at Ahmet Keleşoğlu Faculty of Dentistry involved 100 participants with a single missing tooth and prior CBCT scans. Virtual implants were placed using OnDemand3D (version 1.0.7462) software. On CBCT sections, implants were angled palatally to avoid sinus or nasal cavity perforation. Statistical analysis was conducted using R and MedCalc (version 4.3.2) software. Results: Of the participants (60% female, average age 50.45), 76 edentulous regions required sinus elevation. The implant placeability rates varied across zones (second molar: 39.3%, first molar: 63.1%, second premolar: 78.5%). Implant placement at a palatal angle was significantly higher in the second premolar and first molar regions. Statistically significant differences were observed in the implant placeability between regions. Conclusions: This study supports the feasibility of avoiding sinus floor elevation through palatally angled implants in specific cases, reducing the associated complications.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMDPIen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.3390/diagnostics14121242en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectavoiding sinus liften_US
dc.subjectpalatal angled implanten_US
dc.subjectvirtual implanten_US
dc.subjectvirtual planningen_US
dc.titleAvoiding sinus floor elevation by placing a palatally angled implant: a morphological study using cross-sectional analysis determined by CBCTen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentİstanbul Kent Üniversitesi, Fakülteler, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Klinik Bilimler Bölümüen_US
dc.contributor.institutionauthorÖztaş, Beyza
dc.identifier.volume14en_US
dc.identifier.issue12en_US
dc.relation.journalDiagnosticsen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster