Investigating the efficacy of a handheld fan intervention in children with dyspnea: a randomized controlled study
Citation
Karadağ Aytemiz, Ö. E.; Dinç, Ş.; Gözen, D.; Çiçek, G. Investigating the efficacy of a handheld fan int. rvention in children with dyspnea: a randomized controlled study (2024). Journal of Emergency Nursing.Abstract
Introduction: Dyspnea associated with acute respiratory
tract infections is a common cause of emergency admis sions and can be distressing for children. This study aimed
to evaluate the impact of a handheld fan intervention on
physiological parameters in pediatric patients with dys pnea.
Methods: A total of 59 children aged 2 to 12 years present ing to an emergency department for upper respiratory tract
infection between March 2022 and March 2023 were
assigned to the experimental group (n ¼ 32) or control group
(n ¼ 27) by urn randomization. Both groups received the hos pital’s standard care, including 3 doses of inhaled bronchodi lator at 20-minute intervals. The fan intervention consisted of
parents applying a handheld electric fan to the child’s face at
a distance of 15 cm for 5 minutes after each inhaler treat ment. Oxygen saturation, heart rate, and respiratory rate
were recorded before treatment and after the 3 inhaler treat ments.
Results: There were no statistical differences in descriptive
characteristics between the experimental and control groups
(P > .05). Oxygen saturation values were significantly higher
in the control group before treatment but showed greater in creases in the intervention group after treatment (P < .001).
The intervention group also exhibited greater reductions
than the control group in both heart rate and respiratory
rate after the third treatment than pretreatment values
(P < .05).
Discussion: The handheld fan intervention effectively sup ports inhaler treatment for children with dyspnea. Further
studies are recommended to assess its impact across different
age groups and clinical conditions.
Source
Journal of Emergency NursingURI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jen.2024.06.009https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0099176724001697?
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12780/858