Optimal urethral catheter removal time after robotic radical prostatectomy: A systematic review of the current evidence

dc.contributor.authorMourmouris, Panagiotis
dc.contributor.authorKostakopoulos, Nikolaos
dc.contributor.authorArgun, Ömer Burak
dc.contributor.authorGeorgopoulos, Ioannis
dc.contributor.authorKlapsis, Vasillios
dc.contributor.authorPisiotis, Nikolaos
dc.contributor.authorSalmas, Ioannis
dc.contributor.authorDoğanca, Tunkut
dc.contributor.authorCharamoglis, Sotirios
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-06T11:37:20Z
dc.date.issued2026
dc.departmentİstanbul Kent Üniversitesi, Yüksekokullar, Sağlık Hizmetleri Meslek Yüksekokulu, Tıbbi Laboratuvar Teknikleri Programı
dc.description.abstractBackground: Robotic Radical Prostatectomy has become the dominant surgical approach for localized prostate cancer, offering offers many advantages in postoperative recovery and quality of life. Despite these advances, the standard duration of urethral catheterization- typically 7 days has remained largely unchanged. Objective: To systematically evaluate the feasibility and safety of early urethral catheter removal after robotic radical prostatectomy and to identify the optimal timing for catheter removal. Methods: A systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar and Scopus databases were searched from inception to August 2025. Case reports, non robotic studies and non English publications were excluded Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for non randomized studies and the Jadad scale for randomized controlled trials. Results: Thirteen studies involving 4.055 patients met inclusion criteria, including three randomized controlled trials. Early catheter removal was variably defined, most commonly between 1 and 4 post operative days. Across studies early removal was not associated with increased rates of anastomotic leakage, urethral stricture or bladder neck contracture. Continence recovery seams to be occur earlier with early removal although higher short term urinary retention rates were reported. Overall complications and readmission rates were low. Study quality was acceptable despite the limited evidence from high quality randomized studies. Conclusions: Early catheter removal after robotic radical prostatectomy appears both safe and feasible in appropriate selected patients and may accelerate continence recovery without compromising long-term outcomes. Catheter removal on postoperative days 3-4 appears to offer the most favora.
dc.identifier.citationMourmouris P, Kostakopoulos N, Argun OB, Georgopoulos I, Klapsis V, Pisiotis N, Salmas I, Doganca T and Charamoglis S (2026) Optimal urethral catheter removal time after robotic radical prostatectomy: a systematic review of the current evidence. Front. Surg. 12:1731485.
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fsurg.2025.1731485
dc.identifier.issn2296-875X
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-0127-0005
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.frontiersin.org/journals/surgery/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2025.1731485/full
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2025.1731485
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12780/1364
dc.identifier.volume12
dc.identifier.wos001673226700001
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherFrontiers
dc.relation.ispartofFrontiers in Surgery
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectcatheter
dc.subjectcomplications
dc.subjectprostate cancer
dc.subjectrobotic radical prostatectomy
dc.titleOptimal urethral catheter removal time after robotic radical prostatectomy: A systematic review of the current evidence
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket

Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
Tam Metin / Full Text
Boyut:
461.36 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Lisans paketi

Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
license.txt
Boyut:
1.17 KB
Biçim:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Açıklama: