Retention protocols and relapse management strategies used by orthodontists in Türkiye: A national cross-sectional survey
| dc.contributor.author | Şavkan, İpek | |
| dc.contributor.author | Kandaz, Osman Bilal | |
| dc.contributor.author | Öztaş, Evren | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-06-08T12:30:58Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2026 | |
| dc.department | İstanbul Kent Üniversitesi, Fakülteler, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Klinik Bilimler Bölümü | |
| dc.description.abstract | Background: Orthodontic relapse is a common clinical challenge following orthodontic treatment and may occur due to biological factors such as periodontal reorganization, soft-tissue pressures, and craniofacial growth changes. Although various retention protocols are widely used, there is still no universal consensus regarding the most effective retention strategy. Aim: The aim of this study was to investigate the retention protocols and relapse management strategies preferred by orthodontists in Türkiye following orthodontic treatment. Materials and Methods: A national cross-sectional survey consisting of 33 multiple-choice questions was distributed electronically to members of the Turkish Orthodontic Society using an online survey platform. A total of 100 orthodontists responded, corresponding to a 10% response rate. Statistical analyses were performed using Chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests to evaluate differences according to professional experience. Results: Retention protocols were applied to all patients by 94% of orthodontists, and 74% recommended lifelong retention. Vacuum-formed retainers and bonded retainers were the most commonly used appliances in maxillary and mandibular arches, respectively. Less experienced orthodontists showed a significantly higher tendency to prefer removable retainers in non-extraction Class I crowding cases (p = 0.015). Overall, 87% of orthodontists reported encountering relapse in their clinical practice, most frequently in tooth rotation and anterior open-bite cases (p = 0.006, p = 0.034, respectively). Retreatment was reported in ≤25% of patients in 73% of relapse cases. Conclusions: Orthodontists in Türkiye widely recognize the importance of retention; however, substantial variability exists in retention protocols and relapse management strategies. Professional experience appears to influence certain clinical decisions, highlighting the need for standardized evidence-based retention guidelines. | |
| dc.identifier.citation | İpek Savkan, Osman Bilal Kandaz, Evren Öztas. Retention Protocols and Relapse Management Strategies Used by Orthodontists in Türkiye: A National Cross-Sectional Survey. Int J Orthod Rehabil 2026; 17 (1): 39-59. | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.56501/Intjorthodrehabil.171.ijor0064 | |
| dc.identifier.endpage | 59 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2349-5243 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2542-5579 | |
| dc.identifier.issue | 1 | |
| dc.identifier.orcid | 0000-0002-8144-1320 | |
| dc.identifier.orcid | 0009-0003-0325-3871 | |
| dc.identifier.orcid | 0000-0001-9095-0525 | |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-105038102019 | |
| dc.identifier.scopusquality | Q3 | |
| dc.identifier.startpage | 39 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://www.mmpubl.com/archivesijorthrehab | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12780/1600 | |
| dc.identifier.volume | 17 | |
| dc.identifier.wos | WOS:001767372400004 | |
| dc.identifier.wosquality | Q4 | |
| dc.indekslendigikaynak | Web of Science | |
| dc.indekslendigikaynak | Scopus | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | MM Publishers | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | International Journal of Orthodontic Rehabilitation | |
| dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | |
| dc.subject | Orthodontic Retention | |
| dc.subject | Orthodontic Relapse | |
| dc.subject | Orthodontists | |
| dc.subject | Retainers | |
| dc.subject | Surveys and Questionnaires | |
| dc.title | Retention protocols and relapse management strategies used by orthodontists in Türkiye: A national cross-sectional survey | |
| dc.type | Article |










