• Türkçe
    • English
  • English 
    • Türkçe
    • English
  • Login
View Item 
  •   DSpace Home
  • Fakülteler
  • Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi
  • Klinik Bilimler Bölümü
  • Makale Koleksiyonu
  • View Item
  •   DSpace Home
  • Fakülteler
  • Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi
  • Klinik Bilimler Bölümü
  • Makale Koleksiyonu
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Effect of preparation designs on marginal adaptation and fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with different composite materials

Date

2025

Author

Başgül, Hale Kurt
Şahin, Merve
Üzel, Ekin Görkem Uysal
Hatırlı, Hüseyin
Yaşa, Bilal

Metadata

Show full item record

Citation

Başgül, HK; Şahin, M; Üzel, EGU; Hatırlı, H; Yaşa, B. Effect of Preparation Designs on Marginal Adaptation and Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth Restored With Different Composite Materials. Australian Endodontic Journal (2025).

Abstract

The objective was to evaluate the marginal adaptation and fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth (ETT) restored using various preparation designs and materials. Except for the positive control group (n = 15), 135 teeth with ETT were divided into three main groups (n = 45): MOD (Mesio-occlusal-distal), retention slots and cuspal coverage. Each main group was further subdivided into three sub-groups (n = 15): nano-hybrid composite resin, short fibre-reinforced composite resin (SFRC) and a CAD/CAM nano-ceramic composite block. After chewing simulation, the specimens were examined using SEM; a quantitative marginal adaptation analysis and fracture resistance test were performed. MOD preparations exhibited the highest marginal deterioration (p < 0.001). Gingival marginal deterioration in nano-hybrid composite restorations was significantly higher than in CAD/CAM restorations (p = 0.023), though the difference between nano-hybrid and SFRC restorations was not significant (p = 0.447). The MOD cavity showed significantly lower fracture resistance compared to retention slots and cuspal coverage groups (p < 0.001). SFRC demonstrated the highest fracture resistance (p < 0.001).

Source

Australian Endodontic Journal

URI

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/aej.12944
https://doi.org/10.1111/aej.12944
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12780/1104

Collections

  • Makale Koleksiyonu [120]
  • PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu [158]
  • Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu [301]
  • WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu [268]



DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
@mire NV
 

 




| Instruction | Guide | Contact |

DSpace@Kent

by OpenAIRE
Advanced Search

sherpa/romeo

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypeLanguageDepartmentCategoryPublisherAccess TypeInstitution AuthorThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypeLanguageDepartmentCategoryPublisherAccess TypeInstitution Author

My Account

LoginRegister

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
@mire NV
 

 


|| Guide || Instruction || Library || İstanbul Kent University || OAI-PMH ||

İstanbul Kent University, İstanbul, Turkey
If you find any errors in content, please contact:

Creative Commons License
İstanbul Kent University Institutional Repository is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 Unported License..

DSpace@Kent:


DSpace 6.2

tarafından İdeal DSpace hizmetleri çerçevesinde özelleştirilerek kurulmuştur.