Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorÖzel, Mesut
dc.contributor.authorKoray, Murat
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-02T06:15:41Z
dc.date.available2025-12-02T06:15:41Z
dc.date.issued2025en_US
dc.identifier.citationÖzel, M.; Koray, M. Assessing regionness in Central Asia: A conceptual framework for Post-Soviet regionalism and future projections. Asya Jeopolitiği, 2025, 339-373.en_US
dc.identifier.isbn978-625-386-545-0
dc.identifier.isbn978-625-386-544-3
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.nobelyayin.com/asya-jeopolitigi-asian-geopolitics-22503.html
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12780/1282
dc.description.abstractThis study develops a conceptual testbed to analyze regional integration by applying the theory of “regionness” to Central Asia’s post-2000 trajectory. Combining theoretical frameworks with empirical data from international organizations, we evaluate the region’s political, economic, and security dynamics through five dimensions of regional cohesion: geographic interdependence, institutionalization, identity formation, conflict management, and actor networks. Regional integration by applying the theory of “regionness” to Central Asia’s post-2000 trajectory. Combining theoretical frameworks with empirical data from international organizations, we evaluate the region’s political, economic, and security dynamics through five dimensions of regional cohesion: geographic interdependence, institutionalization, identity formation, conflict management, and actor networks. Findings reveal Central Asia remains a “regional complex” dominated by external influences and fragmented cooperation, where authoritarian governance, water disputes, and elite resistance constrain deeper integration. Despite shared historical and cultural ties, the region’s potential is undermined by Soviet legacies—including arbitrary borders and infrastructure dependencies—and by great-power competition (Russia, China, EU). Recent developments (e.g., rising intraregional trade and climate cooperation initiatives) suggest nascent progress, but institutional weaknesses persist. Projections to 2030 highlight two potential pathways: continued stagnation under entrenched elites or transformative growth through political reforms and infrastructure connectivity. The study concludes with policy recommendations for strengthening regionalism, emphasizing digitalization, youth engagement, and balanced external partnerships. By bridging theoretical rigor with actionable insights, this framework offers a replicable model for assessing regionalization in other contested geographies.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherNobel Akademik Yayıncılıken_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccessen_US
dc.subjectRegionnessen_US
dc.subjectCentral Asiaen_US
dc.subjectRegionalizationen_US
dc.subjectPost-Soviet Regionalismen_US
dc.subjectSecurity Complexen_US
dc.titleAssessing regionness in Central Asia: A conceptual framework for Post-Soviet regionalism and future projectionsen_US
dc.typebookParten_US
dc.contributor.departmentİstanbul Kent Üniversitesi, Fakülteler, İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Fakültesi, Uluslararası İlişkiler Bölümüen_US
dc.contributor.authorID0000-0002-8577-6750en_US
dc.contributor.authorID0000-0002-7859-1184en_US
dc.contributor.institutionauthorÖzel, Mesut
dc.contributor.institutionauthorKoray, Murat
dc.identifier.startpage339en_US
dc.identifier.endpage373en_US
dc.relation.journalAsya Jeopolitiğien_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryKitap Bölümü - Uluslararasıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster