| dc.contributor.author | Özel, Mesut | |
| dc.contributor.author | Koray, Murat | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-12-02T06:15:41Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-12-02T06:15:41Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2025 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.citation | Özel, M.; Koray, M. Assessing regionness in Central Asia: A conceptual framework for Post-Soviet regionalism and future projections. Asya Jeopolitiği, 2025, 339-373. | en_US |
| dc.identifier.isbn | 978-625-386-545-0 | |
| dc.identifier.isbn | 978-625-386-544-3 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://www.nobelyayin.com/asya-jeopolitigi-asian-geopolitics-22503.html | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12780/1282 | |
| dc.description.abstract | This study develops a conceptual testbed to analyze regional integration
by applying the theory of “regionness” to Central Asia’s post-2000 trajectory. Combining
theoretical frameworks with empirical data from international organizations, we evaluate
the region’s political, economic, and security dynamics through five dimensions of regional
cohesion: geographic interdependence, institutionalization, identity formation, conflict
management, and actor networks. Regional integration by applying the theory of “regionness”
to Central Asia’s post-2000 trajectory. Combining theoretical frameworks with empirical data
from international organizations, we evaluate the region’s political, economic, and security
dynamics through five dimensions of regional cohesion: geographic interdependence,
institutionalization, identity formation, conflict management, and actor networks.
Findings reveal Central Asia remains a “regional complex” dominated by external influences
and fragmented cooperation, where authoritarian governance, water disputes, and elite
resistance constrain deeper integration. Despite shared historical and cultural ties, the region’s
potential is undermined by Soviet legacies—including arbitrary borders and infrastructure
dependencies—and by great-power competition (Russia, China, EU). Recent developments
(e.g., rising intraregional trade and climate cooperation initiatives) suggest nascent progress,
but institutional weaknesses persist.
Projections to 2030 highlight two potential pathways: continued stagnation under
entrenched elites or transformative growth through political reforms and infrastructure
connectivity. The study concludes with policy recommendations for strengthening regionalism,
emphasizing digitalization, youth engagement, and balanced external partnerships. By bridging
theoretical rigor with actionable insights, this framework offers a replicable model for assessing
regionalization in other contested geographies. | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık | en_US |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess | en_US |
| dc.subject | Regionness | en_US |
| dc.subject | Central Asia | en_US |
| dc.subject | Regionalization | en_US |
| dc.subject | Post-Soviet Regionalism | en_US |
| dc.subject | Security Complex | en_US |
| dc.title | Assessing regionness in Central Asia: A conceptual framework for Post-Soviet regionalism and future projections | en_US |
| dc.type | bookPart | en_US |
| dc.contributor.department | İstanbul Kent Üniversitesi, Fakülteler, İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Fakültesi, Uluslararası İlişkiler Bölümü | en_US |
| dc.contributor.authorID | 0000-0002-8577-6750 | en_US |
| dc.contributor.authorID | 0000-0002-7859-1184 | en_US |
| dc.contributor.institutionauthor | Özel, Mesut | |
| dc.contributor.institutionauthor | Koray, Murat | |
| dc.identifier.startpage | 339 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.endpage | 373 | en_US |
| dc.relation.journal | Asya Jeopolitiği | en_US |
| dc.relation.publicationcategory | Kitap Bölümü - Uluslararası | en_US |