Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorGündüz, Anıl
dc.contributor.authorGündoğmuş, İbrahim
dc.contributor.authorEngin, Betül
dc.contributor.authorBağlar, Gonca
dc.contributor.authorUsta Gündüz, Elvan Başak
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-27T07:24:39Z
dc.date.available2023-10-27T07:24:39Z
dc.date.issued2022en_US
dc.identifier.citationGündüz A, Gündoğmuş İ, Engin B, Bağlar G, Usta Gündüz EB. The Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Meta-Worry Questionnaire. Arch Neuropsychiatry 2022; 59(3):218−225.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1300-0667
dc.identifier.issn1309-4866
dc.identifier.urihttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36160071/
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.noropsikiyatriarsivi.com/sayilar/2022/59_3/en/npa_59-3_218-225.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12780/670
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: This study aims to investigate the validity and reliability of the Meta-Worry Questionnaire in the Turkish version as a contribution to clinical practice. Method: The research sample consisted of two groups. Cases were people who have General Anxiety Disorder (n=165) and controls were age and sex-matched healthy volunteers (n=158). To evaluate the psychometric properties of the scale, Meta-Worry Questionnaire, Metacognition Questionnaire-30, Beck Depression Inventory, Beck Anxiety Inventory, Penn State Worry Questionnaire and Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 Questionnaire were used. Results: In this study, Cronbach's alpha coefficient values of frequency and belief components were found 0.92 and 0.94, respectively. At the same time, excluding each item, Cronbach's alpha coefficient values of these two components also remained above 0.90, regardless of which item was chosen. While the frequency component accounted for 69.07% of the total variance, the belief component accounted for 72.95%. The area under the ROC curve is 0.948 for the frequency component and 0.944 for the belief component. The construct validity of the scale was tested with Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis and the one-dimensional structure of the scale was shown. To evaluate the psychometric properties of the scale, other scales which are related to metacognition were used. Conclusion: All items in the tool displayed a high correlation with the overall questionnaire. High total variance of the scale indicates its high validity. These results suggest high reliability of the tool as well as consistency of every item it includes.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherTurkish Neuropsychiatric Societyen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.29399/npa.27926en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectGeneralized anxiety disorderen_US
dc.subjectMeta-cognitionen_US
dc.subjectMeta-worryen_US
dc.subjectReliabilityen_US
dc.subjectValidityen_US
dc.titleThe validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Meta-Worry Questionnaireen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentİstanbul Kent Üniversitesi, Fakülteler, İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Fakültesi, Psikoloji Bölümüen_US
dc.contributor.authorIDhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-5159-238Xen_US
dc.contributor.institutionauthorGündüz, Anıl
dc.identifier.volume59en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage218en_US
dc.identifier.endpage225en_US
dc.relation.journalNöro Psikiyatri Arşivien_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster