Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorİldeş, Gökçe Çiçek
dc.contributor.authorSezgin, Batın Ilgıt
dc.contributor.authorVieira, Alexandre Rezende
dc.contributor.authorMenteş, Ali
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-11T08:33:38Z
dc.date.available2022-03-11T08:33:38Z
dc.date.issued2021en_US
dc.identifier.citationIldeş, G. Ç., Sezgin, B. I., Vieira, A. R., & Mentes, A. (2021). A randomized clinical trial of hyaluronic acid gel pulpotomy in primary molars with 1 year follow-up. Acta odontologica Scandinavica, 1–8. Advance online publication. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00016357.2021.1998612en_US
dc.identifier.issn0001-6357
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/00016357.2021.1998612
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12780/483
dc.description.abstractAbstract Objective: This randomized clinical study aimed to evaluate the success of hyaluronic acid (HA) as a pulpotomy medicament of human primary molars and to compare it with formocresol (FC) and ferric sulphate (FS) pulpotomy treatments up to 12 months. Materials and methods: The study was conducted with 130 primary molars of 44 children. The ethical approval and registration to clinical trials (No: NCT04115358) were completed. After the removal of all the coronal pulp tissue, a 0.5% HA gel, or a FC, or a 20% FS solution were applied randomly to the radicular pulp tissues of the primary molars. Then, the pulp chambers were filled with a zinc oxide eugenol cement and restored either with a composite filling material or with a stainless-steel crown. The treatment success rates of the 3 groups were followed and compared clinically and radiographically at 1st-, 3rd-, 6th- and 12th-months. Results: Primary molars treated with FC, FS and HA dressings were clinically successful 77.5%, 86.8% and 87.5% respectively after 12th-month follow-up (p > .05). Radiographic successes of FC, FS and HA groups were lower than clinical successes (57.6%, 68.8%, 57.9% respectively at the 12th-month) but the difference between the groups was not statistically significant (p > .05). Equivalence analysis assuming not more than 10% difference between the materials suggested that HA was not inferior to FC or FS. Conclusions: Within the limitations of this study, our randomized clinical trial shows that HA is a promising pulpotomy medicament in primary molars. However, further studies are justified to further improve the HA material success.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherTaylor and Francisen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://doi.org/10.1080/00016357.2021.1998612en_US
dc.subjectFormocresolen_US
dc.subjectFerric sulphateen_US
dc.subjectHyaluronic aciden_US
dc.subjectPaediatric endodonticsen_US
dc.subjectVital pulp therapiesen_US
dc.titleA randomized clinical trial of hyaluronic acid gel pulpotomy in primary molars with 1 year follow-upen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentİstanbul Kent Üniversitesi, Fakülteler, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Klinik Bilimler Bölümüen_US
dc.contributor.institutionauthorSezgin, Batın Ilgıt
dc.relation.journalActa Odontologica Scandinavicaen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster